// Adds dimensions UUID, Author and Topic into GA4
Wednesday, September 23, 2026
25 C
Singapore

At 59 Tharman is not too old for the PM job

By: Andrew Loh

These independent polls and actual election results have debunked the shallow excuse from the Prime Minister and the infantile propaganda “studies” by CNA and IPS.

source: https://theindependent.sg.sg/more-than-80-percent-want-to-see-tharman-as-singapores-next-pm
source: https://theindependent.sg.sg/more-than-80-percent-want-to-see-tharman-as-singapores-next-pm
Source: http://www.singapore-elections.com/general-election/2015/jurong-grc.htm
Source: http://www.singapore-elections.com/general-election/2015/jurong-grc.htm

And it’s not just non-Chinese such as Tharman which Singaporeans (Chinese, Malays, Indians, Eurasian, etc) have voted for.

In our history there have been not a few – David Marshall, S Rajaratnam, Othman Wok, S Dhanabalan, JB Jeyaretnam, Michael Palmer, Murali Pillai, and so on.

So how is it possible that Singaporeans are ready for a non-Chinese president but not a non-Chinese PM?

Isn’t it clear, from actual election results through the years, that it is the Elite Chinese Boys Club (ECBC) – aka PAP – which perpetuates such propaganda for its own political purpose?

Not true?

Then put Tharman’s name there out there for PM and see how few Singaporeans will object.

There is no other Singaporean leader, besides Lee Hsien Loong himself, who is held is high regard by the rest of the world.

Look at the six frontrunner for the PM post.

Really? That’s the best we’ve got after scraping right to the bottom of the barrel?

And for those saying Tharman is too old, eh aren’t you upping the retirement age (to past 70), and encouraging everyone to work for as long as you can?

And really, you would choose a less experienced and able person for the most important job, over another person who is truly eminently qualified – because the latter is a few years older than the former?

If you do, then please stop all this talk about age discrimination at work.

They would just be pure nonsense because you would be setting an example of age discrimination at the highest level.

Yet, at the same time, we have had one old man remaining in office till the day he died.

He was 92.

And incidentally, he too was Chinese.

And he was revered and praised for dedicating his whole life to public service.

And here we are saying someone who is presently only 59 is too old? Goodness, he is just 5 years older than the current main frontrunner for the PM job.

So what exactly are you talking about?

The logic is just so much #wow. The propaganda is so much #bleah.

Hot this week

Hong Kong socialite Abby Choi’s ex-husband, his brother & father on trial this week for her murder

The 2023 disappearance of Ms Choi, and the discovery of her body, made headlines around the world

Singapore bus commuters now face fines up to S$500 for loud audio and feet on seats; more serious offences can cost up to S$5K...

New rules target passenger nuisance behaviour on buses and at interchanges, while bus staff gain added powers to deal with such bad commuters

Popular Categories

document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => { const trigger = document.getElementById("ads-trigger"); if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { entries.forEach(entry => { if (entry.isIntersecting) { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here observer.unobserve(entry.target); // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); observer.observe(trigger); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
// //
Enable Notifications OK No thanks